South Norwood parents and residents fight plans to transform Cypress Primary 1,020-pupil super school that would be biggest in Croydon

Parents outside Cypress Infants Parents outside Cypress Infants

Parents and residents are fighting plans to transform a popular primary into a superschool that would be the biggest in Croydon with more than 1,000 pupils.

The council has outlined proposals to expand Cypress Primary School in South Norwood to make room for 420 more children as it looks to remedy a chronic shortage of school places.

But parents fear the addition of two further classes in reception, to eventually leave five classes in each year group, would "degrade" the high-performing primary's educational standards while local residents say the area cannot cope.

They argue the influx in traffic would cause roads near to the school to grind to a halt.

Parent Esther Eley, 44, who lives in Auckland Road, said: "The concern is that the school is already at maximum tilt in terms of the area's capacity to take that volume of parents coming and going.

"Extending the size of the school by 60 pupils a year will have a massive impact."

Ms Eley - whose children Uma and Marvan go to the school - added: "It will become the size of a big secondary school.

"It is beyond most people's understanding of what a primary school is and the nurturing environment that you need."

Andy Blackmore, 44, of Cypress Road, said the area already suffered from gridlock when classes finished and claimed he even witnessed congestion spark fights between motorists.

He said: "There is a feeling that these plans are being railroaded through."

"Parents are concerned it will degrade the level of education and residents are up in arms about it because there are already historic issues with traffic.

South Norwood councillor Wayne Lawlor urged the council to respond to the concerns by implementing a traffic plan, possibly involving one-way streets, to alleviate congestion.

He said: "It's a double-edged sword because it's a very popular school and people want to go it.

"I can understand that there will be some parents who are outraged and residents concerned about traffic. 

"I think those concerns are valid, but the council and the school can actually mitigate that damage."

A spokesman for Croydon Council said: "It’s the council’s job to ensure a balance is reached between providing enough school places for every child in Croydon and addressing the concerns of local people. 

"We welcome everyone’s opinions during the consultation stages of new projects and our final plans will be informed by any views that are expressed."

The consultation period on the plans, which would see the school's annual intake increase from three to five classes of 30 children from September next year , will close on March 1.

It would mean the school would eventually cater for 1,020 children.

The planned expansion is one of several schemes, including bulge classes and the creation of new academies, to increase capacity at schools in the wake of a 31 per cent population increase in Croydon between 2001 and 2011.

Comments(13)

christhegoth says...
1:57pm Thu 28 Feb 13

From what I have read these Academies have entrance exams. So if you're kid is average you'll have to write that one off and hope the local Comp has space.

I must admit I'm thinking eggs in baskets on this one. Can the roads handle it? Will school resources be stretched too thin ( resulting in a drop in teaching quality )? The Torys have a habit of underfunding these projects, and that is not good...

christhegoth says...
1:58pm Thu 28 Feb 13

'your kid', not 'you're kid'. Bad moi *slaps wrist*.

Austen - Croydon Cyclists says...
2:24pm Thu 28 Feb 13

It's disappointing that the response to traffic congestion caused by the school is to suggest a one-way street.

All that will do is shift the problem to surrounding streets, and encourage and enable drivers to go faster down them, particularly during times outside the school run. It will make the roads much more dangerous.

What's needed is a green travel plan that will encourage and enable kids (and their parents) to walk, cycle, take the bus or, if they do drive, share, to car share.

Stronger enforcement of parking regulations and speed limits is also required.

christhegoth says...
2:32pm Thu 28 Feb 13

Austen - Croydon Cyclists wrote:
It's disappointing that the response to traffic congestion caused by the school is to suggest a one-way street.

All that will do is shift the problem to surrounding streets, and encourage and enable drivers to go faster down them, particularly during times outside the school run. It will make the roads much more dangerous.

What's needed is a green travel plan that will encourage and enable kids (and their parents) to walk, cycle, take the bus or, if they do drive, share, to car share.

Stronger enforcement of parking regulations and speed limits is also required.
Agreed. More car-pools and decent Public transport are a must. We need to get road-use down.

But even with road-use down in the area will we be able to get it down by enough? Or will they still be stuck with gridlock?

Vezz says...
12:09am Fri 1 Mar 13

Christhegoth,

My elder son sat an exam to get into Harris. However, these exams were to establish what stream he went into. I know children who go there that certainly not picked for their academic prowess! My son also sat an exam to get into Riddlesdown which, I think, is NOT an Academy!

I'm becoming fed up with people slating Academies. My youngest's school has become one and HE didn't sit any exams......

Vezz says...
12:14am Fri 1 Mar 13

Oh, and as a parent who drops off and collects her child from school (yes, sometimes by car if I've been with a client), I would say the main problem is irresponsible parents who think their Jemima is too precious to walk to the car parked further up the road so they park on the zigzag lines! That is so dangerous it makes my blood boil, and I waste no time in telling them so.

christhegoth says...
12:14pm Fri 1 Mar 13

@Vezz: Thank you for the information.

But sadly it is obvious some Academies are selective. And this, I feel, is a problem.

Academies should take anything that is thrown at them and turn it around. Like what Comps have to do. To allow Academies to be selective is really quite iffy.

Vezz says...
7:06pm Fri 1 Mar 13

@ Christhegoth,

Thank you for your reply.

I do hope not, and I don't believe that to be the case. Which Academies do you believe are selective? I thought this was illegal? However, I do believe they cherry-pick the best teachers as they can afford to pay them a better salary than a State school as they set their own budgets.

As a parent I do the very best for my children. Whilst I agree ALL schools should be good, sadly that isn't the case.

christhegoth says...
7:56pm Fri 1 Mar 13

@Vezz:

It's something that's been mentioned in past stories. Unfortunately I'm naff at names. But the allegation is that some Academies do aptitude tests to decide if they take you or not. Which is clearly a selection scheme and stat-rigging.

It definitely needs investigating, although it isn't really my field.

Vezz says...
6:12pm Sat 2 Mar 13

@ Christhegoth,

Please see the link below for details pf HASN's admission policy:

http://www.croydon.g
ov.uk/contents/depar
tments/education/pdf
/1107666/harris-sout
h-norwood.pdf

Sadly, it looks like when my other son is ready to go to secondary school in 3 years time, he will not benefit from having a sibling at the school - which was one of the main reasons my elder son didn't get into HACP.

christhegoth says...
6:38pm Sat 2 Mar 13

This is the mention of the Harris 'entrance exam':

http://www.thisiscro
ydontoday.co.uk/Acad
emies-Croydon-impact
-education-borough/s
tory-18022005-detail
/story.html

If they're only taking the best or best supported it's pretty obvious they'll get better scores. And yes it is stat-rigging ( cherry-picking to be precise ).

Vezz says...
6:56pm Sat 2 Mar 13

@Christhegoth,

I had read the report when it came out and I'm still unconvinced Harris cherry-picked students. I do not believe there has been a seismic shift in the area and that all of a sudden there has been an explosion of gifted or best supported students. If the child has an SEN (statement of educational needs) they are much more likely to be accepted than a child without, therefore I cannot understand how this could be seen as cherry-picking the best students.

I think the whole admissions policy is ambiguous, with children living next door not accepted while children from another borough are. The whole concept is unbelievably complicated.

christhegoth says...
7:00pm Sat 2 Mar 13

@Vezz: Hence why I feel this needs investigating.

It's quite possible they're picking the best and SEN's so that their figures look better AND they fulfill the SEN criteria as well. Zero average kids being taken, mostly gifted kids going in, and then SEN's to keep up the ol' image.

Which means average kids are dumped on other schools and stat-rigging still happens.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree