Paedophile policeman who led a double life spared jail

Former Merton policeman Dominick Akinlade got a suspended jail sentence

Former Merton policeman Dominick Akinlade got a suspended jail sentence

First published in News
Last updated
Croydon Guardian: Photograph of the Author by , Chief reporter

A paedophile policeman who led a double life has been spared jail after coming face-to-face with those he has put behind bars.

Dominick Akinlade, 37, was curious about pre-pubescent youngsters following years of porn use and searched for images online of both boys and girls, Southwark Crown Court heard.

His curiosity turned into an addiction and he began viewing images that were ‘clearly illegal’ according to prosecutor James Murray-Smith.

In Akinlade’s defence, Ian Joblin said the case had a very dramatic effect on him and his time in Wandsworth prison had been traumatic.

Akinlade, dressed in a pale blue long-sleeved top and wearing glasses, admitted five counts of making indecent images of children at a previous hearing.

He was found to be in possession of a number of indecent images of children on his home computer which he had downloaded from the internet - an offence which constitutes ‘making’ images under the Protection of Children Act.

Mr Joblin said: “He has lost his career- that is completely gone.

“It is to his credit he resigned effectively immediately.

“He suffers tremendous remorse.”

The court heard Akinlade, of Fairmile Avenue, Streatham, was picked up by officers from the Metropolitan Police’s paedophile unit at his home on October 1 last year.

Four computer hard drives, which Akinlade declared at the time were ‘full of child porn’ were among the items seized.

Prosecuting, Mr Murray-Smith said: “He was extremely frank.

“At the time he was 36 years old - he said since the age of 15 or 16 he had access to adult heterosexual pornography on the internet.

“He said he stumbled across stuff that was clearly illegal of young girls.

“He said he was looking for images of girls and boys going through puberty or shortly after puberty engaged in sexual acts.

“He got rid of it if it showed children in great distress.”

Defending, Mr Joblin said the defendant had tried to take his own life on a number of occasions and it was for his own safety that he was kept behind bars until the sentencing on Monday, May 19.

But it was while being held in Wandsworth prison that Akinlade found himself behind bars with criminals he had been responsible for locking up.

Mr Joblin said: “He has seen a fair number of people that he has been responsible for putting there.

“Three and a half months in custody for a former police officer is traumatic.”

Mr Joblin added his life as a police officer in Merton and his interest in inappropriate material meant he had a double life and although these were in conflict there was no evidence it interfered with his work as a police officer.

Addressing Akinlade in the dock, Judge Anthony Leonard said: “On your arrest you made a full and frank admission to the fact that you had been looking at child pornography for many years.

“I have taken into account you have lost your job as a police officer and this was separate from it.

“I take into account your remorse and that you have been in custody for three and a half months.

“What you have done is repugnant and wrong.”

The judge handed Akinlade a six month jail sentence but opted to suspend it for two years.

He was ordered to pay £600 costs and will be subject to a Sexual Offences Prevention Order for five years.

The Judge ordered the forfeiture and destruction of the computer seized by police.

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:06am Thu 22 May 14

Tranquilisis says...

Why is this article written in a way that tries to evoke pity for him? He developed 'an addiction' and had a hard time in his life - so what? He was well aware that what he was doing was wrong, and sick. Where is the sympathy for the victims? I hate this idea that because it was on the internet then it's a victimless crime - boo hoo, poor policeman 'accidentally' started searching for these images, then because 'addicted' to them. Seriously?
Why is this article written in a way that tries to evoke pity for him? He developed 'an addiction' and had a hard time in his life - so what? He was well aware that what he was doing was wrong, and sick. Where is the sympathy for the victims? I hate this idea that because it was on the internet then it's a victimless crime - boo hoo, poor policeman 'accidentally' started searching for these images, then because 'addicted' to them. Seriously? Tranquilisis
  • Score: 14

12:27pm Thu 22 May 14

Dani78 says...

so what if he came across criminals he out away, he is no better then those that he did, he deserved to be locked up for a long time why was he shown leniency... why is it Rape and sexual convictions are being given less then someone that has a fight.. How Criminal justice system is a complete joke.. He knew if he was caught with thisvile sad stuff he could be faced with going to prison did that stop him no, the only thing that stopped this sick **** was being caught by his colleagues... noticed they didnt stick a picture up of him neither..
so what if he came across criminals he out away, he is no better then those that he did, he deserved to be locked up for a long time why was he shown leniency... why is it Rape and sexual convictions are being given less then someone that has a fight.. How Criminal justice system is a complete joke.. He knew if he was caught with thisvile sad stuff he could be faced with going to prison did that stop him no, the only thing that stopped this sick **** was being caught by his colleagues... noticed they didnt stick a picture up of him neither.. Dani78
  • Score: 3

10:58pm Thu 22 May 14

Noddyblanket says...

Knocks me sick. “He got rid of it if it showed children in great distress.” Oh, how nice and thoughtful of him! I cry tears of pity for these poor children. Can only begin to imagine how terrible their lives must be and it must never be forgotten that each and every image out there has a human beings life behind it. Just sick
Knocks me sick. “He got rid of it if it showed children in great distress.” Oh, how nice and thoughtful of him! I cry tears of pity for these poor children. Can only begin to imagine how terrible their lives must be and it must never be forgotten that each and every image out there has a human beings life behind it. Just sick Noddyblanket
  • Score: 3

12:18pm Fri 23 May 14

trasie says...

I think someone should complain about the judge. If the guy had been a teacher per say, both positions are of trust, then he would go to jail. This pos
is supposed to protect the public, children included. I don't care what his excuses are, he's a grown up and, as a police officer, knows the law.
I think someone should complain about the judge. If the guy had been a teacher per say, both positions are of trust, then he would go to jail. This pos is supposed to protect the public, children included. I don't care what his excuses are, he's a grown up and, as a police officer, knows the law. trasie
  • Score: 2

12:58pm Fri 23 May 14

Dani78 says...

I sincerely hope that someone gets hold of him and gives him a an absolute beating and leaves him scarred for life...
I sincerely hope that someone gets hold of him and gives him a an absolute beating and leaves him scarred for life... Dani78
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree