Contact us: Got a photo? Text SLPICS to 80360, click to upload your story, or call
020 8722 6350
7:00am Thursday 16th April 2009 in News
Campaigners have branded the Jobcentre “Pimp Centre” and called for the Government organisation to stop advertising jobs in the sex industry.
A spokesman from the Croydon Community Against Trafficking (CCAT) said presenting exploitation as a job opportunity in economically hard times was incredibly irresponsible.
Campaigners stood outside the Brixton Jobcentre with a blown-up Jobcentre advert for “Female Adult Webcam Models” to provide “entertainment for a male client basis in which you will be required to be nude/semi-nude and which will involve explicit sexual dialogue”.
Another advert for dancers in Croydon reads: “Duties require the successful applicant to be nude. Experience preferred but not essential as training is given. You will be required to dance in a club.”
The Department for Work and Pensions claims it has no choice but to carry these adverts following a 2003 legal ruling that Ann Summers should be allowed to advertise through Jobcentre Plus.
However, a spokeswoman from pressure group Object said girls as young as 17 answering jobs for masseuses, escorts and lap dancers found they were expected to sell sex.
Anna van Heeswijk, grassroots coordinator for Object said: ”It is well known that ‘escort’ and ‘masseuse’ are euphemisms for prostitution.
"Working in Ann Summers is very different from providing direct sexual services in prostitution or lap dancing.
“Sex industry jobs are not glamorous or harmless fun.
"They are exploitative, they make sexual harassment seem normal, and they promote the idea that women are always sexually available as long as you have a bit of cash to spare.”
A spokesman from CCAT said: “We are appalled that any organisation, government or otherwise, would be willing to advertise exploitation as a job opportunity.
“It is this same type of deception that is used to lure women in other countries into so-called jobs here in the UK and into a life of slavery in places like Croydon.
“The terms 'masseuses and escorts' are not only common language for prostitution, but we have evidence that shows that it is common language for the selling of trafficked women in our borough and evidence that proves that these are merely terms for a much more depraved reality which sees women sexually exploited, in many cases, against their will.
“Presenting exploitation to women as a viable option in the midst of economic vulnerability is nothing short of irresponsible.”
A DWP spokesperson said: “If a vacancy is legal we have to carry it, however, adult entertainment jobs are clearly marked as not suitable for people under the age of 18 and are only discussed with people who enquire about them.
“We have recently undertaken a full consultation exercise on the rules to see how we can tighten them even further.
"We will now review the existing policy in light of the responses received and aim to publish a formal response by the end of June.”
• Do you think Jobcentre should be able to advertise these jobs? Let us know in the comments section below.
Comments(8)
ANNE GILES
says...
6:59pm Thu 16 Apr 09
Bob Peel wrote:Bob, really!!
I definately think the Jobcentre should be allowed to advertise these jobs. In fact if there's any interviewing/trialli ng to be done I'll even give them a hand. Who are the CCAT anyway.
Fred1
says...
7:51pm Thu 16 Apr 09
Bob Peel
says...
7:51pm Thu 16 Apr 09
ANNE GILES wrote:I have to get my kicks somehow Anne - even if I have to lower my standards once in a while!
Bob Peel wrote:Bob, really!!
I definately think the Jobcentre should be allowed to advertise these jobs. In fact if there's any interviewing/trialli ng to be done I'll even give them a hand. Who are the CCAT anyway.
graveyardsmash
says...
1:00am Fri 17 Apr 09
MH1
says...
12:18pm Fri 17 Apr 09
Andy Acton
says...
12:54pm Fri 17 Apr 09
MH1
says...
7:18pm Fri 17 Apr 09
Andy Acton wrote:Many of the jobs advertised in the Jobcentre lead to prostitution. This is an industry where 95% are problematic drug users (Home Office 2004 'Solutions and Strategies'). Lap dancing clubs are also part of the sex industry and there are many facts and figures showing many people who work in this industry are dependent on drugs and are being forced into acting in ways they don't want to ('A Growing Tide' 2008, 'Profitable exploits' Bindel 2004). These figures show that it is a completely different industry to that of McDonalds and the two are not comparable. Also, there is the question of choice, in these economic times, people (mostly women) are going to be pressured into these jobs out of economic necessity. That isn't any sort of choice. When in the industry, their freedom will further be eroded. The government shouldn't be providing a way in into the sex industry, it should be providing a way out.
Everyone calls in an exploitative industry but you could also say the same about cleaing jobs or entry level minimum wage jobs in the like of McDonalds or one of the large supermarkets. If it was that bad then people wouldn't choose to do it. I happen to know someone who works in a well paid role in the city that works in such a role in her free time. Far from being exploited she earns very good money and hooses her own hours. They are a business the same as everyone else and as such should be allowed to advertise. If its ok for the jobcentre to adviertise commission only "get rich quick" schemes (of which there are a lot) then why not a role in the sex industry. Its a personal choice to do this role and I can't really see the jobcentre cutting your benefit because you back out of taking such a role can you?
Find jobs
Search Now »
Find your ideal partner
Search Now »
Find homes
Search Now »
Find cars
Search Now »
Bob Peel says...
1:52pm Thu 16 Apr 09
ng to be done I'll even give them a hand.
Who are the CCAT anyway.