- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@croydonguardian
Follow us on Twitter
- Find us on Facebook
Croydon Guardian
Like us on Facebook
NHS moves forward to axe children's services (From Croydon Guardian)
Contact us: Got a photo? Text SLPICS to 80360, click to upload your story, or call
020 8722 6350
BSBV moves forward to axe children's services in SW London
1:15pm Friday 6th July 2012 in News By Sophia Sleigh, Reporter
Queen Mary's Hospital for Children at St Helier Hospital
Health bosses are pushing forward with their plans to close three children’s wards in SW London.
NHS SW London's Better Services Better Value (BSBV) review into healthcare in the region today published formal recommendations to have a single children’s hospital in SW London based at St George’s Hospital in Tooting.
St Helier, Kingston and Croydon University hospitals are all set to lose their inpatient paediatric care as a result.
This will mean that St Helier Hospital’s 18-bed inpatient ward at its specialist children’s hospital could be lost.
Details of the BSBV plans first emerged two months ago.
If the plans are approved, the children’s hospital centred at St Georges will be supported by extended community services and three sites with short stay beds for children.
The review also recommended that each hospital with an A&E should have a senior doctor present 14 hours a day. At present, all four SW London hospitals have children’s beds but do not meet the requirement for senior doctor presence.
Each hospital with an A&E should have a dedicated children’s A&E open 24/7. There will be beds located in each hospital with an A&E where most children can be assessed and treated.
Children will be able to stay at these units for up to 24 hours. However if a child is very unwell or they need to stay in hospital longer than one day then they will be transferred to the specialist Children’s Hospital at St George’s.
Under the recommendations St Helier Hospital is also set to lose its A&E therefore children would have to be admitted to A&E’s at other hospitals in SW London.
The final recommendation made by the review is that more care for children and young people should be provided at home and in community settings rather than hospital, meaning investment will be required in children’s community services.
The proposals will go in front of the joint boards of SW London PCTs in September for approval.
Public consultation on the closures is due to start on September 17.
Comments(32)
theavengers
says...
2:43pm Fri 6 Jul 12
palmerpalmer81
says...
3:31pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Danny Bhoy
says...
4:50pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Michael Pantlin
says...
5:05pm Fri 6 Jul 12
BSBV will soon be disbanded having done their dirty work so you won't be able to get back at them when it all goes wrong. Good bloody riddance to BSBV.
Danny Bhoy
says...
5:27pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Michael Pantlin
says...
5:42pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Danny Bhoy
says...
5:58pm Fri 6 Jul 12
My other advice is that just because someone disagrees with you, there is no need to attack them personally. My views are bass on my own experience and what I have read, if I come
over as acting superior I am sorry, I have no specialist knowledge of this I have just read the clinical reports and considered the evidence of stroke and trauma reforms.
Danny Bhoy
says...
6:00pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Michael Pantlin
says...
6:06pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Care at home? What is the nursing team going to move indoors with us or just pop in once a day so when we pop our clogs it's not registered as a hospital death? What do our two MPs have to say about this? What about the thousands of people who signed the petitions saying they want none of this? What exactly will be the purpose of the consultation when people continue to reply we've already told you we don't want any of this? This "Luddite" for one wants answers.
Danny Bhoy
says...
6:12pm Fri 6 Jul 12
on things that may answer their questions rather than just complaining.
I do sympathise as I took a similar view on stroke changes once and even when I did read u
Danny Bhoy
says...
6:13pm Fri 6 Jul 12
lilacgeorge
says...
7:36pm Fri 6 Jul 12
xeepo
says...
9:41pm Fri 6 Jul 12
exa_cordon
says...
10:01pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Danny Bhoy wrote:i'd have you know that a number of stroke patients are not getting the care they need cos St Georges does not always have the capacity needed and the other hospitals have had to stop their stroke services
Sorry, was still a bit worried when I did read up on it. But I was proved wrong. Stroke care in London now is better than almost anywhere in UK
kazza76
says...
11:58pm Fri 6 Jul 12
Michael Pantlin
says...
2:58am Sat 7 Jul 12
kazza76 wrote:Thanks for posting details of the Save St. Helier Picnic Funday Event kazza76. Unless I'm immobilised stuck in bed on pain killers from the regular treatment I get from wonderful St. Helier as I am at the moment I will be there on my mobility scooter and at any other demo event as I have always done. Would be even more of a funday if we were allowed to spit roast the BSBV people who came up with this *hit along with the remote politicians and civil servants at the DOH responsible for driving this destruction.
instead of bickering about who said what try finding out the real facts that the reason they want to close these services is to make way for a state of the art surgical unit so by getting rid of a&e,maternity and childrens services they deem this viable which is ridiculous because what most people fail to realise is that while kingston st georges and croydon are deemed to be saved they are gong to be over loaded with all of st heliers patients and if people are to have elective surgery they will have to travel to st heliers for it so the bsbv need to get things in perspective also all these decisions were made before a financial assessment was done, i have been attending the meetings and i am part of the save st helier campaign we are holding a family funday and picnic for the event on 8th of september opposite the hospital on the green all are welcome 12-4 please come along sign a petition and show your support also join us on our page on facebook. save st helier maternity and a&e.
Michael Pantlin
says...
3:02am Sat 7 Jul 12
Michael Pantlin
says...
3:14am Sat 7 Jul 12
exa_cordon wrote:Quite right exa_cordon. Friends who've been there have told me of three to four hour waits at St. George's A&E and that the weekend care on the cardiac ward is "rubbish" both recent reports. That's without the additional 213,000 patient load from St. Helier's catchment area. I don't buy this doctors spread too thinly so move them to St. George's. All of the staff are busy all the time so how will it help when you move a few doctors and then follow them with thousands more patients?
Danny Bhoy wrote:i'd have you know that a number of stroke patients are not getting the care they need cos St Georges does not always have the capacity needed and the other hospitals have had to stop their stroke services
Sorry, was still a bit worried when I did read up on it. But I was proved wrong. Stroke care in London now is better than almost anywhere in UK
What a nightmare if you are very sick, find it agony to move and then after creeping through the traffic you sit for hours. It's obvious the already cut number of beds is going to be cut further so the part of the quart that won't fit into the pint pot will be discharged home where they will pay by the hour to get their basic care from homecare popping in a for a few minutes. Deaths at home or in the back of ambulances in the traffic will not appear in the statistics as hospital deaths. Those who cannot get their care in the reduced system will no doubt at some point be offered expensive private care if they can find or borrow the money. It's not just A&E, Maternity and Children's Services going from St. Helier and Childrens' services from Croydon and Kingston but also most of the essential diagnostic Pathology Services from them all. In other hospitals Pathology services have been privatised, The Fat Cats in their stripey suits are preparing to emerge from the woodwork I bet.
Michael Pantlin
says...
3:25am Sat 7 Jul 12
Agamemnon & Cassandra
says...
7:02pm Sat 7 Jul 12
That conclusion has come about because they need to save money. Do you remember the Governments "Care in the Community" initiative in the 1980's, supposedly all about quality of life? What have we got now? All the Day Centres being closed and disabled and Downs Syndrome people forced to commute everywhere by public transport to their obvious discomfort.
The NHS is top heavy with incompetent hospital Managers and useless officials, not least at Kingston. Perhaps if we got rid of them and employed more doctors and nurses we would all be better off.
exa_cordon
says...
8:32pm Sat 7 Jul 12
kazza76
says...
12:03am Sun 8 Jul 12
!!!!!!!
kazza76
says...
12:03am Sun 8 Jul 12
!!!!!!!
Michael Pantlin
says...
12:53am Sun 8 Jul 12
http://www.dailymail
.co.uk/news/article-
2170267/My-17-hours-
hell-hospital-patien
t-died-thirst-Left-u
nattended-agony-writ
ers-account-ordeal-N
HS-centre-excellence
.html
The Cardinal
says...
9:44pm Sun 8 Jul 12
Danny Bhoy
says...
6:40am Mon 9 Jul 12
Danny Bhoy
says...
6:43am Mon 9 Jul 12
kazza76
says...
3:50pm Mon 9 Jul 12
Sameer the First
says...
8:38pm Tue 10 Jul 12
Danny Bhoy
says...
10:22pm Thu 12 Jul 12
I do despair of people playing the man not the ball, but I have said my piece about this. The point remains that the people shouting loudest don't seem to have even read the reports from local doctors, there is a great deal of hysteria and bandwagon jumping but very little understanding of what the changes are about. The simple reason for that is that people are shouting rather than listening, ranting rather than reading. I feel like I have made my points in this debate, but until people actually consider the evidence, there is little point listening to their arguments. If I was a doctor who believed the BSBV changes would save people's lives, I would not be inclined to consider the opinions of people who can't even take the time to read why I and others think change is needed.
And really, why should I waste time talking to people about it when they have made up their minds without considering the facts? It is a very poor campaign that doesn't even look at what it is meant to be arguing against.
Politicians are being opportunistic and cynical when they know these proposals will save lives, the local press think a campaign against will sell newspapers and those shouting the loudest don't have a clue about what the reports that have led to this recommendation say. It's an unholy trinity and while Sameer's comments are flattering, I am reminded of the old adage: Never argue with a fool, people mig not know the difference.
andyacton
says...
10:23am Fri 13 Jul 12
kazza76 says...
2:15pm Fri 6 Jul 12