Protestors trying to prevent the North Kingston Centre being demolished to make way for a new secondary school have had their 781-signature petition rejected by councillors.

The campaign objected to the loss of the 1930s building, the removal of adult education and other services from the Richmond Road location and using the site for a large secondary school.

However, in a 30-minute debate on Tuesday triggered by the petition, councillors from both parties argued the new school took priority over the existing building.

Petitioner Christine Arnold spent months gathering the support of students who take adult education courses in the building and knocking on doors in nearby roads.

She said: “I was disappointed the leader and executive felt the need to be so vehement in demolishing another point of view.

“To me, they failed yet again to answer any of the issues raised. I just feel that have missed the opportunity to put thing right or explain. Just dismissing everything does not explain it.

“It’s all right to dismiss me, but there are 781 people who agreed and they should not be dismissed. It’s not fair to do that.”

Councillor Dennis Doe, who represents Tudor ward, said he did not like to go against 781 signatories in his own area, but there was no alternative to demolishing the building.

Councillor David Cunningham, also a member for Tudor, said: “I agree the North Kingston Centre is a very attractive building.

“It’s not unique and there are a number of them around but that does not detract from the fact it’s a very attractive building.

“However, north Kingston does need a new secondary school desperately. I’m told it is the only practical location to put a new secondary school in north Kingston.

“I’m told we can’t get funding from the Government to purchase a site if the council can make available its own site.”

In another blow to campaigners, the council has written to English Heritage objecting to any proposals to give the building listed status.

A council spokesman said: “The council commented that, as a local planning authority, we do not consider the building is worthy of listing on the basis that it has no special architectural or historic interest.”